The Present Age

Share this post
"Don't speak ill of the dead" is anti-journalism
www.readtpa.com

"Don't speak ill of the dead" is anti-journalism

When someone who spent his life in a position of massive power dies, journalists need to give it to us straight.

Parker Molloy
Dec 10, 2021
28
4
Share this post
"Don't speak ill of the dead" is anti-journalism
www.readtpa.com

I can’t stop thinking about this Twitter thread from CNN White House correspondent John Harwood…

Twitter avatar for @JohnJHarwood
John Harwood @JohnJHarwood
my favorite Bob Dole moment came in May 1985 he was Senate Leader, worried about deficits that Ronald Reagan's tax cuts had run up to curb them, he sought a reduction in annual cost-of-living increases in Social Security benefits hard to do; Social Security's really popular
4:25 PM ∙ Dec 9, 2021
90Likes17Retweets
Twitter avatar for @JohnJHarwood
John Harwood @JohnJHarwood
he won by barest of margins decisive vote came from GOP colleague wheeled in from the hospital afterward, he hailed the "strong message" for fiscal responsibility why "strong", i asked him as a young reporter, if the margin was so slim?
4:28 PM ∙ Dec 9, 2021
53Likes3Retweets
Twitter avatar for @JohnJHarwood
John Harwood @JohnJHarwood
"how long have you been around here?" Dole replied the message turned out to ne weaker than he thought Congress ultimately dropped the reduction; Reagan helped sink it but as i learned over time, bare majorities can send strong messages when Congress does something really hard
4:33 PM ∙ Dec 9, 2021
65Likes4Retweets

Earlier this week, former Senator and three-time failed presidential candidate Bob Dole died at the age of 98.

He lived a long life. Longer than most. Good for him. And yesterday, he joined an extremely select group in our country’s history to have lain in state in the Capitol Rotunda. Once again, good for him.

Visitors come to pay their respects to former Senator Bob Dole, (R-Kan.) as he lies in state in the Rotunda of the Capitol in Washington on Thursday, Dec. 9, 2021. Dole died on Dec. 5, 2021, at the age of 98. (Tom Brenner/The New York Times)

In announcing his death, the Elizabeth Dole Foundation noted that he had “served the United States of America faithfully for 79 years,” which… according to my back-of-the-napkin math… is a very long time. (Though I do have questions about what time periods they’re referring to, as Dole has not held elected office since 1996, so it seems like this was kind of a from-the-time-he-enlisted-in-the-army-to-fight-in-World-War-II-until-his-death kind of calculation — but that doesn’t really matter here. He served the country for a long time is the point.)

Twitter avatar for @DoleFoundation
Elizabeth Dole Foundation @DoleFoundation
It is with heavy hearts we announce that Senator Robert Joseph Dole died early this morning in his sleep. At his death, at age 98, he had served the United States of America faithfully for 79 years. More information coming soon. #RememberingBobDole
Image
4:38 PM ∙ Dec 5, 2021
19,195Likes4,572Retweets

I have no problem with Dole getting a fancy funeral, and it’s understandable that politicians wouldn’t want to inject controversy into his death… But journalists need to knock it off.

A lot of the early coverage of Dole’s passing from mainstream U.S. politics reporters framed him as a kindly man who was a Republican before the time of Trump, which they all seem to have decided was some sort of event that came out of absolutely nowhere and not simply the logical continuation of the GOP’s trajectory over the course of several decades. Responding to this, some people pointed out that not only did Dole support Trump in 2016, but he also supported him in 2020, calling himself a “Trumper.” It wasn’t until Trump lost and was embarrassing himself with tantrums over his false “stolen election” complaints that Dole said he was “Trumped out.”

The Present Age is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

When others pointed this out on social media, they were slammed for “disrespecting” Dole. How is that factual statement, that Dole’s most recent contribution to politics was to support Donald Trump, “disrespectful?” Only in a world where anything less than a glowing hagiography is considered “disrespect” would that statement be in any way controversial — yet here’s Fox News plastering tweets across the screen of its viewers chiding journalists and commentators for highlighting the truth.

Via Justin Baragona/Twitter

Journalists should absolutely report on positive things politicians do during their time. Dole won two Purple Hearts and two Bronze Stars for his military service. That’s great and absolutely should be noted in coverage. During his time in the House of Representatives, he joined 152 Democrats and 138 Republicans in voting for the Civil Rights Act of 1964, arguably one of the most important pieces of legislation in our country’s history. Awesome. He was crucial to the passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Hugely significant.

But you can’t talk about the good without also mentioning the not-so-good. He wasn’t a throwback to a time before Trump, he set the stage for Trump.

He attacked the media, earning a rebuke from the Nixon White House for smearing famed journalist Walter Cronkite. He called members of the Democratic Party names (He famously called Johnson Administration Attorney General Ramsey Clark of being a “left-leaning Marx-mallow”). In an attempt to cover up Nixon’s involvement in the Watergate scandal, he proposed a resolution that would have ended live coverage of the hearings. When criticized by a constituent for this stunning move against transparency, Dole responded by dismissing that person as “an anti-Nixon Democrat.” (Sound at all familiar to people who spent the past 5 or 6 years hearing Trump supporters dismissing anything that came from a “Never-Trumper”?)

Letter from Bob Dole to John D. White, September 12, 1973, Folder 15, Box 316, Series 4, “Dole Papers.”

And even after the Watergate scandal broke, Dole dug in as Nixon’s personal defender. From a 1996 New York Times article:

As the 1972 election approached, Mr. Dole routinely questioned the motives and the ethics of the Democratic Presidential nominee, George S. McGovern, and the Democratic Party chairman, Larry O'Brien.

Then, after the Watergate scandal broke in the summer of 1972, Mr. Dole only stepped up his attacks. He accused the McGovern campaign of "a pattern of willful deception," demanding a Federal investigation into what he said was "more than $250,000 in hidden and secret McGovern campaign funds." And when The Washington Post turned up more damaging stories on the break-in, Mr. Dole turned his attacks on the newspaper, which he called Mr. McGovern's "partner in mudslinging."

And yes, he threw his support behind Donald Trump — twice.

Donald Trump Jr. sits beside retired American politician former US Senator Bob Dole during the Republican National Convention at Quicken Loans Arena, Cleveland, Ohio, July 18, 2016. (Photo by David Hume Kennerly/Getty Images)

Yes, even after Trump was impeached for trying to withhold foreign aid in exchange for the Ukrainian president to announce a criminal investigation into Joe Biden and his family.

But back to Harwood’s “favorite Bob Dole moment”

Why does a journalist have a “favorite” moment at all? In the end, Harwood notes that Dole didn’t actually get his way (which is a good thing, given that what he wanted to do was cut benefits to senior citizens to “pay for” Reagan’s tax cuts — actual “fiscal conservatism” would have been to oppose the ridiculous tax cuts, not to find a way to shift the burden to the poor and elderly).

To have a “favorite” moment from a politician, especially when it’s about how hard he fought to screw over people on Social Security, paints journalists like Harwood in a terrible light. This isn’t a movie or a basketball game or any other form of entertainment; this is governing. It’s one thing to have a favorite LeBron James dunk, but it’s actually kind of sick to have a favorite time a recently-deceased politician tried to hurt the poor.

Dole sits alongside then-President Donald Trump and Vice President Mike Pence during a 2018 ceremony to award him the Congressional Gold Medal. Photo by Franmarie Metzer)

The impulse, especially in the world of media, to try to find positive things to say about the people they’ve covered, to avoid saying anything that could come off as “negative” — even if that thing is a factual statement about supporting Trump — has a name: political correctness.

It’s uncouth to level criticism of the recently deceased, but the truth is that when it comes to people who spent decades in positions of massive, national political power, there’s actually no better time to examine their full record and legacy. Obviously, there are moments where it’s best to hold back criticism (for instance, if you’re actually at someone’s funeral, it’s probably best not to make a scene), and it really does depend on the level of power and influence the person held during their lifetime (yes, it’s probably best to be polite about your recently deceased aunt or uncle or neighbor — but that’s not applicable when talking about presidents, senators, judges, and legislators, generally), especially in the press.

Honest journalism needs to take a “warts and all” approach to covering the recently deceased. And there’s a reason I waited a couple of days to send this following Dole’s passing: this is not actually about him. I don’t have some sort of personal investment in Bob Dole’s legacy one way or another. No, this is about the next time a prominent politician dies — Democrat or Republican. It’s fine to honestly discuss their records, to trust that audiences can handle it. That’s how future generations can benefit from the mistakes of the past — or the present.

4
Share this post
"Don't speak ill of the dead" is anti-journalism
www.readtpa.com
4 Comments
founding
Sean Corfield
Dec 11, 2021Liked by Parker Molloy

This seems to be a very widely applicable human trait. Even at the ridiculously low level of a hobbyist group: several times over the last couple of decades, a member of the cat fancy has passed away after being widely criticized for years for their mean-spirited behavior and yet, all of a sudden, now they are dead, those very same critics praise that member for being such a wonderful, warm-hearted person. Drives me up the wall! And it's orders of magnitude worse when it's the mainstream press heaping praise on someone who spent much of their life trying to make things worse for others.

Expand full comment
ReplyCollapse
Sunset & Fire
Writes Sunset’s Substack
Jan 4, 2022

I'm finally catching up on your excellent writing and want to say, "Bravo!" There's no upside to journalistic whitewashing the legacy of public figures who, as you say, have laid the foundation for the present. And it's not "speaking ill" to report facts and context; that's the job.

Expand full comment
ReplyCollapse
2 more comments…
TopNewCommunity

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Parker Molloy
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing